Introduction
The western side of the Melanesian island of New Guinea is governed by Indonesia, where the country has long faced a secessionist struggle as indigenous Melanesian groups in West Papua attempt to break away to form their own state. The dispute has remained contentious as long as Western New Guinea has been part of Indonesia, with the very instrument that brought the territory into the country being questioned. It would be incorrect to assert that this is the sole reason that West Papua has seen such an enduring campaign for independence. Various social and economic issues like systematic and everyday discrimination, large-scale in-migration, excessive military presence, regional wealth disparities, and a lack of access to public services remain current-day realities, continuing to encourage and inflame such sentiments among West Papuans. The issue, to Indonesian dissatisfaction, has also increasingly become internationalised, with various Melanesian states like Vanuatu taking particular interest in it. Indonesia has, on the whole, been unwilling to consider independence for the region for various reasons. However, its policy over this long period has consistently proved unsuccessful in bringing a lasting solution to the secession campaign or the issues that prolong it.
Indonesian Interests in West Papua
A clear incentive for Indonesia to hold onto West Papua is that the region is rich in natural resources, particularly gold and copper. The Grasberg mine on the island is one of the world’s largest gold and copper mines, contributing significantly to the island’s economy and that of Indonesia in general. PT Freeport Indonesia (PTFI), which runs the Grasberg mine, is a joint venture between Freeport-McMoRan, which has 48.76% ownership and manages the mine’s operations, and the Indonesian government, which has the majority share of ownership at 51.24%. The mine’s operations accounted for 0.78% of the Indonesian economy in 2018, and between 1992 and 2023, PTFI contributed 29.31 billion USD to the state in various forms, including taxes, and a further 64.9 billion USD in indirect benefits. More locally, it contributes around 33% of Papua’s economy and around 80% of Mimika regency’s economy (Blesia, Hatcher and Ratuva, 2025: 268).
Beyond the very clear economic incentives to retain West Papua, Indonesia also likely fears that Papuan success in seceding could create a threat to Indonesian sovereignty, in that it could embolden other ethnic or cultural minorities to strive for independence, especially since East Timor already succeeded in gaining independence from Indonesia in 1999 (Singh, 2008: 175).
Factors Encouraging the Campaign
The Act of Free Choice (AFC) in 1969, in effect, solidified Indonesian sovereignty over West Papua. West Papuan nationalists have often questioned its legitimacy and implementation. The Dutch resistance to transferring New Guinea to Indonesia during the latter’s independence led to a long territorial dispute, which culminated in the US-brokered 1962 New York Agreement. This agreement instructed Indonesia to organise the AFC, a vote for the inhabitants of the island on whether they wished to be part of Indonesia or not, before the end of 1969 (United Nations, 1962).
However, it allowed Indonesia to conduct the AFC through a ‘consultation’ system, rather than a direct vote under universal adult franchise. In the chosen system, the voters were a set of representatives of the people selected from various groups within the region’s population. Indonesia’s influence on the selection of representatives and the committee that chose them created an easy means for Indonesia to manipulate the results. Evidence of bribery and intimidation of representatives has further brought the process into question (Musgrave, 2015: 220; Saltford, 2003: 158-9).
Beyond the process of integration into Indonesia, Papuan experience with racism also fuels separatist sentiment in the region. Papuans face everyday discrimination based on their ethnic origin, cultural practices, and religion, as part of their personal lives, being openly considered inferior and compared to animals by non-Papuans in the country, and sometimes being refused access to public transport, commercial establishments, and student housing (Human Rights Watch, 2024: 3). Measures like the insistence on the use of Bahasa Indonesia in schools and the banning of the West Papuan national flag show another form of discrimination against Papuans (Webb-Gannon, 2022: 1052). The inflow of non-Papuans into West Papua has also led to demographic changes in the region, with migrants dominating urban economies. The proportion of indigenous Papuans has, as a result, fallen, and in some urban areas, migrants form a majority. This migration, in light of various cultural differences, has aggravated instances of racism (Blades, 2020: 6; Taliawo, 2022: 78).
Another issue is the expansion of industries such as mining and palm oil production, which have led to indigenous dispossession of land and environmental degradation. Compensation provided upon land acquisition is often inadequate as well. Major infrastructural developments like the Trans-Papuan Highway have also proved controversial, aiding the flow of migrants into, and goods out of, the region, rather than benefiting indigenous Papuans (Eichhorn, 2022: 1002, 1004). Further, despite the region’s resource wealth and the expanding exploitation of it, large sections of the indigenous population live below the poverty line. In general, the island’s various provinces show high rates of poverty (West Papua province: 19.58%; Southwest Papua province: 17.50%; Papua province: 17.82%; South Papua province: 19.26%; Central Papua province: 29.45%; Highland Papua province: 27.21%) compared to the national average of 8.25% (BPS-Statistics Indonesia, 2026). West Papua also faces an inadequate provision of public services such as education and healthcare. Based on statistics from the 2020 census, the region had the highest child mortality rates, infant mortality rates, neonatal mortality rates, and maternal mortality in Indonesia (Human Rights Watch, 2024: 3).
Indonesia maintains a heavy military presence in the region to control what the state defines as terrorist groups and to protect strategic infrastructure like the Grasberg mine. Military operations and various instances of arrests, torture, and killings further create dissatisfaction in the minds of Papuans (Wangge, 2023: 222). Further, misconduct by security forces rarely gets brought to justice (Human Rights Watch, 2024: 4).
Internationalisation of the Western Papuan Dispute
The issue of West Papua has been increasingly receiving international attention and response. This is particularly true for Melanesian states in the Pacific. The matter has been discussed at various levels by these states, including at the Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG). The grouping was established in 1986 by Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, Fiji, and the Kanak and Socialist National Liberation Front, based on an ideology of anti-colonialism and Melanesian solidarity (Blades, 2020: 11; Wangge and Lawson, 2021: 12-13).
In various Pacific Island countries, the issue of West Papua is one that resonates with their populations. Vanuatu, in particular, has played a strong role in the separatist struggle, sheltering various Papuan pro-Independence figures. It also helped in the organisation of various groups struggling for West Papuan independence to combine into the United Liberation Movement for West Papua (ULMWP). However, increased Indonesian outreach has placed these countries in a difficult balancing act, and in some cases, encouraged a change in their stance on Indonesian sovereignty on the island. This can be seen in the case of Tuvalu and Nauru. Papua New Guinea, while recognising Indonesian sovereignty over West Papua, has been troubled by the porous border between the two states, which has been the site of various kinds of trafficking. The border has also seen West Papuans fleeing into PNG to escape Indonesian security forces (Blades, 2020: 11-9). Indonesian action in this realm mainly takes cultural and economic forms, the latter of which include technical assistance and development aid, which can be traced back to the 1980s. Patterns of aid flows appear to correspond to support for Indonesian sovereignty over West Papua. Papua New Guinea and Fiji, Indonesia’s closest supporters in the region, have received the most aid, while Vanuatu and Solomon Islands have received little (Wangge and Lawson, 2021: 15-7).
Indonesian outreach further supported the country in obtaining observer status at the Melanesian Spearhead Group in 2011. Under the chairmanship of the Solomon Islands, the ULMWP was granted observer status in 2015. This, however, coincided with Indonesia’s elevation to associate member status. Since then, while both parties are present in the MSG, dialogue has been limited, and the stalemate has remained (Blades, 2020: 18-9).
Beyond Melanesia, various organisations have campaigned for Papuan self-determination. These include the International Parliamentarians for West Papua (IPWP), launched in 2008 in the British Parliament, which lobbies for the addition of West Papua to the UN list of non-self-governing territories. Offices of the ‘Free West Papua’ campaign also operate in several different countries, including Australia and the United Kingdom. Indonesia has consistently criticised the presence of these groups (Wangge and Lawson, 2021: 11).
Conclusion
West Papua remains an open issue for Indonesia, as both sides seem unwilling to back down. Indonesia, ruling out secession, has attempted to placate the region through special autonomy provisions within the republic since 2001. It continues to rely on this framework, with a bill containing some revised provisions, including a boost to the special autonomy fund, having been passed in 2021 (Da Costa and Lamb, 2021). It divided the island into six provinces from the earlier two in 2022, a move which critics feared would weaken Papuan opposition and push more power into the hands of the state (Widianto and Lamb, 2022). In parallel, the ULMWP has set up a government-in-waiting for the region, following the declaration of a provisional government in 2020 in rejection of the extension of the special autonomy framework. Additionally, instances of violence continue. In February 2026, forces associated with the Free Papua Movement (OPM) opened fire on a plane, killing its pilot and co-pilot. In the same month, the same group also attacked a PT Freeport Indonesia convoy (Reuters, 2026). Similar instances of violence had earlier led to a shortening of the Indonesian Vice President’s visit to the region (International Crisis Group, 2026). Without a drastic reorientation of either the Indonesian state or Papuan separatist groups, the issue is likely to persist.
References
Adhinegara, B.Y. and Rakhmat, M.Z. (2026) Freeport’s Papua mine deal buys time. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/freeport-s-papua-mine-deal-buys-time.
Blades, J. (2020) West Papua: The Issue That Won’t Go Away For Melanesia. Lowy Institute. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep25091.pdf?acceptTC=true&coverpage=false&addFooter=false.
Blesia, J.U., Hatcher, P. and Ratuva, S. (2025) ‘Predatory mining, conflict and political spaces: the case of Grasberg mine in West Papua,’ Society & Natural Resources, 39(2), pp. 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2025.2553355.
BPS-Statistics Indonesia (2026) Percentage of Poor Population (P0) by Province and Area (Percent), 2025. https://www.bps.go.id/en/statistics-table/2/MTkyIzI=/percentage-of-poor-population–p0–by-province-and-area.html.
Chauvel, R. (2021) ‘West Papua: Indonesia’s last regional conflict,’ Small Wars and Insurgencies, 32(6), pp. 913–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2021.1990491.
Da Costa, A.B. and Lamb, K. (2021) ‘Indonesia parliament passes revised autonomy law for restive Papua,’ Reuters, 15 July. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/indonesia-parliament-passes-revised-autonomy-law-restive-papua-2021-07-15/.
Davidson, H. (2019) ‘Indonesia arrests dozens of West Papuans over claim flag was thrown in sewer,’ The Guardian, 18 August. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/aug/18/indonesia-arrests-dozens-of-west-papuans-over-claim-flag-was-thrown-in-sewer.
Eichhorn, S.J. (2022) ‘Resource extraction as a tool of racism in West Papua,’ The International Journal of Human Rights, 27(6), pp. 994–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2022.2036722.
Human Rights Watch (2024) “If it’s not racism, what is it?” Discrimination and other abuses against Papuans in Indonesia. book. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/media_2025/08/indonesia0924web.pdf.
International Crisis Group (2026) CrisisWatch: Tracking Conflict Worldwide. https://www.crisisgroup.org/crisiswatch/database?location_region%5B0%5D=30&crisis_state=&created=&from_month=1&from_year=2026&to_month=1&to_year=2026&page=3.
Kusumaryati, V. (2019) ‘Adat Institutionalisation, the State and the Quest for Self-Determination in West Papua,’ The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 21(1), pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670238.
Musgrave, T.D. (2015) ‘An analysis of the 1969 Act of Free Choice in West Papua,’ in Cambridge University Press eBooks, pp. 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107360075.017.
Reuters (2026) ‘Attacks in Indonesia’s Papua kill three, hit plane and Freeport convoy,’ Reuters, 11 February. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/two-killed-after-civilian-airplane-shot-landing-indonesias-papua-police-say-2026-02-11/.
Saltford, J. (2003) The United Nations and the Indonesian takeover of West Papua, 1962-1969. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203221877.
Singh, B. (2008) Papua: Geopolitics and a Quest for Nationhood. Routledge.
Taliawo, R.G. (2022) ‘The Indonesianization of West Papua: Development of Indonesia’s Attitudes and Policies towards West Papua and the Dynamics of the Papua Freedom Movement,’ Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 4(2), pp. 71–83. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2022.4.2.10.
ULMWP (2020) Press Release: ‘Provisional Government’ of West Papua announced, Indonesian rule rejected. https://www.ulmwp.org/press-release-provisional-government-of-west-papua-announced-indonesian-rule-rejected#:~:text=Provisional%20Government%20created%20to%20achieve,the%20banned%20Morning%20Star%20flag.
United Nations (1962) Agreement between the Republic of Indonesia and the Kingdom of the Netherlands concerning West New Guinea (West Irian), United Nations Treaty Series. 6311. https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%20437/volume-437-i-6311-english.pdf.
Viartasiwi, N. (2018) ‘The politics of history in West Papua – Indonesia conflict,’ Asian Journal of Political Science, 26(1), pp. 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2018.1445535.
Wangge, H.R. (2023) ‘Securitization of a political conflict in Southeast Asia: Disengaging the Indigenous audience in West Papua,’ Asian Security, 19(3), pp. 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2023.2225419.
Wangge, H.R. and Lawson, S. (2021) ‘The West Papua issue in Pacific regional politics: explaining Indonesia’s foreign policy failure,’ The Pacific Review, 36(1), pp. 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2021.1931417.
Webb-Gannon, C. (2022) ‘#Papuanlivesmatter: how a narrative of racism has elevated West Papua’s decolonisation movement,’ The International Journal of Human Rights, 27(6), pp. 1050–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2022.2057959.
Wenda, B. (2025) Implementing democracy before independence: ULMWP inaugurates thousands of representatives. https://www.ulmwp.org/implementing-democracy-before-independence-ulmwp-inaugurates-thousands-of-representatives.
Widianto, S. and Lamb, K. (2022) ‘Indonesia passes contentious law to create more provinces in Papua,’ Reuters, 30 June. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/indonesia-passes-contentious-law-create-more-provinces-papua-2022-06-30/.
Wijanarko, T. (2025) ‘Integrated policy strategies for resolving separatism in Papua to achieve national security and stability,’ Journal of National Paradigm – Based Resilience Strategy., 2(1), pp. 17–34. https://doi.org/10.61511/napbres.v2i1.2025.1732.
Woodman, C. (2022) ‘The West Papuan liberation movement, Indonesian settler colonialism and Western imperialism from an international solidarity perspective,’ The International Journal of Human Rights, 27(6), pp. 1017–1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2022.2132235.