Executive Summary
Hong Kong’s “One Country, Two Systems” framework is a constitutional framework devised by China to govern Hong Kong, guaranteeing that, while Hong Kong remains a part of China, it can still exercise its own autonomy, with fundamental rights and freedoms such as freedom of speech and movement. The December 2025 conviction of media tycoon Jimmy Lai marks a definitive dismantling of this constitutional framework along with the erosion of Hong Kong’s common law system. Lai’s landmark trial took place under the 2020 National Security Law (NSL), a piece of legislation enacted by China to deter and penalize activities considered threats to national security, including foreign collusion and secession. The trial signals to the international community and prospective investors that fundamental legal guarantees safeguarding political speech and commercial predictability are absent. For international businesses, this shift replaces a transparent, rules-based market with a high-risk regulatory environment characterized by legal ambiguity.
Key Points
- Jimmy Lai’s conviction under the NSL on charges of sedition and conspiring to collude with foreign forces highlights the shrinking of judicial independence and press freedom.
- The case undermines confidence in Hong Kong’s traditional role as a rules-based international business hub distinct from that of mainland China.
- Political intervention and enforcement of the NSL may accelerate brain drain, capital divesting, and relocation of corporations.
Analysis
The conviction of Jimmy Lai represents a structural transformation of Hong Kong’s political and economic identity. Lai, the founder of a now defunct pro-democracy newspaper “Apple Daily”, was sentenced in 2026 to 20 years of prison on charges related to collusion with foreign forces and sedition under the NSL imposed by Beijing in 2020 to quell protests in Hong Kong in 2019. The trial’s legal reasoning represents a profound departure from common law principles, as the Court of Final Appeal accepted Article 42 of the National Security Law, displacing traditional presumptions in favor of bail without considering compatibility with the presumption of innocence and right to bail. Despite official pledges that the NSL would not be retrospective, the court heavily relied on Lai’s activities prior to the law’s enactment on June 30, 2020.
Hong Kong’s status as an international financial center has depended on institutional features distinguishing it from mainland China, focusing on judicial independence, freedom of information, and regulatory transparency, and legal protections for businesses. While Hong Kong’s legal system differentiates itself from China’s, the city’s judiciary is becoming more closely aligned with Beijing’s authority. What previously defined Hong Kong’s political and economic beliefs reassured investors that contracts would be enforced fairly and political pressures would be limited. The Lai case demonstrates these safeguards are increasingly subordinate to Beijing’s political priorities. As demonstrated in 2020, following the implementation of the NSL, the US announced that it would not recognize Hong Kong’s status as a separate customs territory, ending numerous advantageous trade and tariff privileges with Hong Kong. The closure of Apple Daily and the prosecution of journalists indicates a derailment of democratic principles including freedom of media and expression. International firms relying on transparent environments, predictable governance, and stability are dissuaded from investing in Hong Kong.
The NSL institutionalizes intimidation to suppress challenges to the rule of law. By expanding state coercive powers and establishing mechanisms to bypass standard legal protections, the legislation criminalizes mainstream political discourse. The loss of judicial scrutiny and the potential for transition into the legal system of mainland China creates an insecure environment for potential foreign investment. The Lai case undermines trust in institutions by reinforcing perceptions that political loyalty outweighs legal neutrality.
Policy Implications
- Lai’s conviction confirms Hong Kong’s status as a geopolitical flashpoint, generating continued friction between China and the West.
- Multinational corporations may relocate because they anticipate heightened operational costs and legal conflicts, in conjunction with an ambiguous judiciary system.
References
Chan, J.M. (2021) ‘Judicial responses to the national security law: HKSAR V Lai Chee Ying’, SSRN Electronic Journal [Preprint]. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3842790.
Chopra, S. and Pils, E. (2022). The Hong Kong National Security Law and the Struggle over Rule of Law and Democracy in Hong Kong. Federal Law Review, 50(3), pp.292–313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0067205×221107410.
Donkervoort, E. (2025). Lai Conviction Marks Latest Blow to Hong Kong’s ‘One Country, Two Systems’ Framework. [online] Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada. Available at: https://www.asiapacific.ca/publication/lai-conviction-marks-latest-blow-hong-kongs-one-country-two-system-framework [Accessed 25 May 2026].
Hawkins, A. (2026) Jimmy Lai, Hong Kong pro-democracy figure, sentenced to 20 years in prison, The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/feb/09/jimmy-lai-sentencing-china-hong-kong-pro-democracy-businessman (Accessed: 23 May 2026).
Hong Kong Legal Hub (n.d.). ‘One Country, Two Systems’ and The Basic Law – Hong Kong Legal Hub. [online] ‘One Country, Two Systems’ and The Basic Law – Hong Kong Legal Hub. Available at: https://www.legalhub.gov.hk/details.php?a=10&v=one-country-two-systems-and-the-basic-law#.
Hong, Y. (2024). How Hong Kong reclaimed its spot as Asia’s top financial centre. [online] ThinkChina – Big Reads, Opinions & Columns on China. Available at: https://www.thinkchina.sg/economy/how-hong-kong-reclaimed-its-spot-asias-top-financial-centre.
Hou, Z. and Peng, Q. (2023). The national security law for Hong Kong: a corpus-driven comparative study of media representations between China’s and Anglo-American English-language press. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01699-7.
LI, N. (2026). ‘We cannot give up’: Hong Kong journalists navigate fear, surveillance and shrinking space. [online] France 24. Available at: https://www.france24.com/en/asia-pacific/20260503-hong-kong-journalists-fear-surveillance-press-freedom-lai-shrinking-space.